I visited an Indian Casino recently, which had several regular CRAPS tables, which due to ""Social Distancing"" were limited to but 3 Players per side. To compensate, they raised the minimum Bet to $ 15 @ each Table, where last time I visited they had tables @ $5 & $10 Minumums. This Casino also has a 8 Seat Electronic CRAPS Table which @ the time I viewed it, had 2 Players at it. This Casino also had 4 Single Seat Electronic CRAPS Tables,with all 4 being Played!!! Looks like the COVID-19 Pandemic is directing Casino CRAPS to Favor Single Seat Play. Comments... eagleeye2
The thing about these single player bubbles is that you have to shoot (I assume) and therefore place a pass/don't pass line bet. With the 8 seater terminals you could just let others shoot and place bets only, and we have learned within these here green walls that the come bet sucks (or not). Casinos didn't put these single seater bubbles in to help the player.
Night Attack when you put your money in the timer counts down at zero it shoots the dice you can make any bet or not make a bet
Read somewhere the covid will die out in August. We can only hope. This is crazy shutting this down to prevent a cold.
I just need random dice outcomes. I don't care if it comes from 2 casino dice, 2 bubble dice, or even a computer generated roll. Are we talking about 'electronic' dice outcomes here?
I know the guys here don't like the electronic games. They think they're fixed. If dice outcomes are random, they don't need to be fixed to beat you. Computer RNG's are considered to be random, that's what the 'R' stands for.
Well, a random number generator can generate random numbers all day long, but that in itself, does not make the game "random". What if, the program allowed for the rejection, of the random number gernerated, when that number was "inconvenient", and a second shot, at a "new" random number. Both numbers were generated randomly, by the RNG, but suddenly, the game would no longer be random. I've never heard anybody say, that a casino would HAVE to cheat to win. That's not the issue. The question would be, would they cheat, to win more, or win more often.
You just verified you have absolutely no understanding of random number generation. Your “what if” is totally assinine. Are you related to EE2? Or are you really EE2?
Spelling was never one of my "top-ten" Ma'am, if eye had new that it annoyed yew, I wood miss pell stuff moor off tin.
Oh, I understand them very well. That post has little at all to do with RNGs. It has to do with the software employing the RNG. There is a legitimate situation where a generated number would need to be thrown out. As with a card game using a RNG, if the number generated, corresponds, to a card already in play.
