kcadillac - 21 February 2012 01:32 PM

All these systems and opinions…....and not one strategy on when to lock in a profit on a shooter.  Just press, 5x odds, press,  press, etc. 
  Geez…......if a shooter rolls 3 or more numbers, seven outs and you dont show a profit….......you are either playing the wrong game or need to rethink your gambling strategy.  Some of these systems shown here,  shooter could roll 10 or more numbers, seven out and u would lose money!
  If you are on the dice table to pay bills…....u will lock in a profit…......believe me.  But some people just like the “action”.  Oh well.
good luck all….....keep ur discipline
kcadillac

One of the weaknesses of the exponential betting strategy is that it takes a few rolls to get set up.  However, it does protect against a PSO or a point, followed by a box number, then seven out (to a lesser degree).  But once you get your come bet established and set the 5x odds, a single hit puts you in the money or at least even for that number.  On the 2nd hit of the same #, your winnings rise quickly. The pressing of the odds is done at a measured rate so that you are putting most of the winnings into the rack.  Only 20%-25% of the winnings is used to press the odds portion of the bet.  And these are true odds, or free odds as some will say, because there is not house vig taken.

And yes, it could be possible that there would be 8 or 10 tosses that could result in bad or mediocre results.  So a bettor has to have the mindset that they will need a larger bankroll to get this method going.  It also requires vigilance because there can be steep loses prior to a winning roll. This is definitely not for the under-funded or the weak of heart.

This betting strategy promises exponentially increasing winnings on multi-toss rolls, particularly where the shooter is repeating numbers.

Because it is a Come strategy, you should expect to leave money on the felt that is subject to a ComeOut Seven.

If you are concerned about a 3 or 4 point roll before 7 out, then this (Exponential Bet)  is not the strategy for you.  Instead, look to one of the DP, DC or Lay strategies.
The original question was about this betting strategy, but others have added their comments about what they do.

If you have a good strategy for this type of roll, please share it with us.

DeMango,

I am w/ you. Most people that watch my play, don t understand the COME wager. I simply tell them it s the same as the PASS LINE wager; only you can not bet the COME on the come-out.  Most dealers ask me which casino I deal craps at.

I would call playing double odds on a PASS LINE and COME points is aggressive(I ratio 5,6 and 8 against the come, field and prop bet 3 to 1 to make a profit on every roll, even when then seven shows it s face); as you increase your odds on the PASS LINE or COME point thus increasing your aggressive play. Aggressive play, playing just 2X the odds, one can cover their stake and show a profit on the third roll of the dice.

Everyone, the dice have NO BIAS. Even the best of the best controlled shooters point and seven out. And the novice players can have a unbelieveable hot streaks.  I have found, for the player that track the rolls on each hand, in a series of six hands; two hands last longer than average hand.  This is by the odds if the dice; that AFTER a point has been established, the game will end within 5 rolls or less.  And thur aggressive wagering a player can gain advantage out the house in less than 4 rolls of the dice.  Does this happen eveytime?  NO.

Is 2 above average hands out of 6 a streak?

I play what I feel is the greatest chance of profitting.  I work bets on the come-out because the dice have no bias.  I start on the DONT PASS wanting a FOUR or TEN to be the established point.  I perfer to wager less money to win more money, but if the chance for me to show a profit, I will risk more money to win less money.

I think I have stated this before, ”  I know what my comfort zone is for losing, I just haven t found my comfort zone for winning.”